Current:Home > NewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -FinanceMind
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-16 13:36:09
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (75)
Related
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- TikToker Katie Santry Found a Rug Buried In Her Backyard—And Was Convinced There Was a Dead Body
- Washington state fines paper mill $650,000 after an employee is killed
- Anne Hathaway’s Reaction to The Princess Diaries 3 Announcement Proves Miracles Happen
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Georgia businessman convicted of cheating two ex-NBA players of $8M
- Ashley Tisdale Shares First Pictures of Her and Husband Christopher French's 1-Month-Old Baby Emerson
- A Tennessee nurse and his dog died trying to save a man from floods driven by Hurricane Helene
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- 'CEO of A List Smiles' charged with practicing dentistry without license in Atlanta
Ranking
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- NFL says it's not involved in deciding when Tua Tagovailoa returns from concussion
- A Texas execution is renewing calls for clemency. It’s rarely granted
- Christina Hall Lists Her Tennessee Home for Sale Amid Divorce From Josh Hall
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- MLB playoff predictions: Who is the World Series favorite? Our expert picks.
- Man fatally shoots his 81-year-old wife at a Connecticut nursing home
- Keanu Reeves crashes at Indianapolis Motor Speedway in pro auto racing debut
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
'Joker: Folie à Deux' ending: Who dies? Who walks? Who gets the last laugh?
A buzzing threat? Yellow jackets swarm in North Carolina after Helene destroys their homes
A buzzing threat? Yellow jackets swarm in North Carolina after Helene destroys their homes
The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
Neighbors of Bitcoin Mine in Texas File Nuisance Lawsuit Over Noise Pollution
Julianne Moore confronts euthanasia in 'profound' new film 'Room Next Door'
Ruby Franke's Daughter Slams Trash Lifetime Movie About Her Family