Current:Home > InvestEPA's proposal to raise the cost of carbon is a powerful tool and ethics nightmare -FinanceMind
EPA's proposal to raise the cost of carbon is a powerful tool and ethics nightmare
View
Date:2025-04-17 17:30:22
One of the most important tools that the federal government has for cracking down on greenhouse gas emissions is a single number: the social cost of carbon. It represents all the costs to humanity of emitting one ton of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, including everything from the cost of lost crops and flooded homes to the cost of lost wages when people can't safely work outside and, finally, the cost of climate-related deaths.
Currently, the cost is $51 per ton of carbon dioxide emitted.
NPR climate correspondent Rebecca Hersher tells Short Wave co-host Aaron Scott that the number is getting an update soon. The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed raising the cost to $190. The change could dramatically alter how the government confronts climate change.
"That's a move in the right direction," says Daniel Hemel, a law professor at New York University who studies these cost benefit analyses.
But the new, more accurate number is also an ethics nightmare.
Daniel and other experts are worried about a specific aspect of the calculation: The way the EPA thinks about human lives lost to climate change. The number newly accounts for climate-related deaths around the world, but does not factor in every death equally.
Listen to Short Wave on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and Google Podcasts.
Got questions or story ideas? Email the show at ShortWave@NPR.org.
This episode was produced by Margaret Cirino, edited by our supervising producer Rebecca Ramirez, and fact-checked by Anil Oza. Katherine Silva was the audio engineer.
veryGood! (68631)
Related
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Pete Davidson’s New Purchase Proves He’s Already Thinking About Future Kids
- Carbon Capture Takes Center Stage, But Is Its Promise an Illusion?
- A Biomass Power Plant in Rural North Carolina Reignites Concerns Over Clean Energy and Environmental Justice
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Boy Meets World's Original Topanga Actress Alleges She Was Fired for Not Being Pretty Enough
- Can forcing people to save cool inflation?
- Supreme Court looks at whether Medicare and Medicaid were overbilled under fraud law
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Inside Clean Energy: Here’s How Compressed Air Can Provide Long-Duration Energy Storage
Ranking
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Why zoos can't buy or sell animals
- How Tucker Carlson took fringe conspiracy theories to a mass audience
- Warming Trends: Butterflies Bounce Back, Growing Up Gay Amid High Plains Oil, Art Focuses on Plastic Production
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Shell fired after CNBC anchor alleges sexual harassment
- As Animals Migrate Because of Climate Change, Thousands of New Viruses Will Hop From Wildlife to Humans—and Mitigation Won’t Stop Them
- This Next-Generation Nuclear Power Plant Is Pitched for Washington State. Can it ‘Change the World’?
Recommendation
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Supreme Court looks at whether Medicare and Medicaid were overbilled under fraud law
The U.S. economy is losing steam. Bank woes and other hurdles are to blame.
YouTuber MrBeast Shares Major Fitness Transformation While Trying to Get “Yoked”
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
BuzzFeed shutters its newsroom as the company undergoes layoffs
A group of state AGs calls for a national recall of high-theft Hyundai, Kia vehicles
Consumer safety regulators adopt new rules to prevent dresser tip-overs