Current:Home > MarketsWest Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies -FinanceMind
West Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies
View
Date:2025-04-16 16:18:34
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — West Virginia lawmakers on Thursday soundly rejected a bill that would have expanded a law enforcement database to include collecting DNA samples from people arrested for certain felonies.
Some legislators cited privacy concerns during a lengthy debate before the 66-30 vote by the Republican-dominated House of Delegates. Three members were absent.
“This is just another step away from our liberties,” said Republican Del. Rolland Jennings of Preston County.
Current state law requires a DNA sample to be taken from anyone convicted of a felony and certain misdemeanors. The bill would have expanded the law to obtain DNA through cheek swabs from adults arrested on felony charges of violence against someone, a burglary or a case involving a minor. The samples would be sent to a state crime lab and the results stored in an FBI database.
“If you don’t want your DNA taken, don’t do a heinous crime,” said Republican Del. Scot Heckert, a bill supporter.
But some Democrats were concerned about the bill’s potential infringement on Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
“This bill is extremely broad,” Ohio County Democrat Shawn Fluharty said. “It’s dangerous territory to put people in a DNA database simply because they’ve been arrested just for probable cause and accused of a crime.”
Mason County Republican Jonathan Pinson, a bill supporter, said it was no more of a constitutional concern than collecting fingerprints from suspects. Pinson said lawmakers should be more concerned about helping crime victims whose cases remain unsolved “because we don’t know where to look” for evidence.
The bill also contained steps to expunge someone’s DNA records from the database if they were cleared of the felony charges.
Prior to the vote, the House twice rejected bids to halt debate on the bill.
veryGood! (81486)
Related
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- QUIZ: How much do you know about what causes a pandemic?
- New York City’s Solar Landfill Plan Finds Eager Energy Developers
- 9 diseases that keep epidemiologists up at night
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- New Apps for Solar Installers Providing Competitive Edge
- Introducing Golden Bachelor: All the Details on the Franchise's Rosy New Installment
- Clean Energy Investment ‘Bank’ Has Bipartisan Support, But No Money
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- State Clean Air Agencies Lose $112 Million in EPA Budget-Cutting
Ranking
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- In Spain, Solar Lobby and 3 Big Utilities Battle Over PV Subsidy Cuts
- Coach Just Restocked Its Ultra-Cool, Upcycled Coachtopia Collection
- U.S. Military Report Warns Climate Change Threatens Key Bases
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Elizabeth Holmes, once worth $4.5 billion, says she can't afford to pay victims $250 a month
- Love Coffee? It’s Another Reason to Care About Climate Change
- The EPA Once Said Fracking Did Not Cause Widespread Water Contamination. Not Anymore
Recommendation
Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
Analysis: India Takes Unique Path to Lower Carbon Emissions
Dakota Access Pipeline: Army Corps Is Ordered to Comply With Trump’s Order
COVID-19 is a leading cause of death among children, but is still rare
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
Members of the public explain why they waited for hours to see Trump arraigned: This is historic
At the first March for Life post-Roe, anti-abortion activists say fight isn't over
Climate Activist Escapes Conviction in Action That Shut Down 5 Pipelines